Thursday, October 23, 2008

Recycled Style

When one thinks about originality, many times clothing and a sense of personal style may come to mind. Clothes are, for many people, the way in which they express their personal likes and dislikes. Many times, people use clothing to express their individuality. The advertisement that I chose is called “By the Seashore”. This advertisement showcases the May 2008 clothing line for a company called Free People. The advertisement, which is in the form of a commercial, is made available through YouTube.com, which, in turn makes it accessible and available to be embedded in many popular online outlets such as MySpace or Facebook. This advertisement shows several models by the seashore wearing the clothes made by Free People. The commercial creates the desire to be carefree and also the desire of having liberation in general with the use of visual and aural cues.



The commercial makes this feeling of freedom come across aurally with the use of relaxing background keyboard music. The music gives off a relaxing atmosphere while watching the images on the screen. It is important to note that all of the sound in the commercial is non-diegetic; that is, we do not hear the ocean waves crashing or the sound of wind blowing against the models.

Visually, the commercial shows the models wearing the company’s clothes in relaxed poses along the shoreline. By doing this, it aims to create the desire in consumers of wanting to be just like these models and suggesting that if one wears these clothes, one can also became liberated. It aims to create the feeling that these clothes might be able to make our style even more personal while at the same time, making us more “stylish”.

The clothes that are being sold in this advertisement are created by the Free People company, the same company that also started the Urban Outfitters clothing stores. These stores appeal to young adults wanting to create a fresh, new, unique sense of style. These stores derive their styles from clothing that are typically found in thrift stores and adapt them to be mass-produced and sold at expensive prices. In general, can it be called personal, fresh, fashion sense when it is being fabricated to be mass-produced? Is it new style when it is simply a copy of the past? This particular ad aims to create the desire for the “new”, the undiscovered, the rare. Even the name of the company, Free People, gives the sense that their consumers have the freedom to choose what they want to wear, or that they are free to pick a wardrobe that matches well their own, personal lifestyle. It is also important to note that this clothing company, and thus, this commercial is only aimed at women. The image of woman that is being created in the ad is one that is carefree yet careful in her looks and her fashion sense.

The secondary advertisement, which I found equally as intriguing as the first, I found in a magazine. The magazine industry is aimed at people of all ages with specific magazines aimed for totally different groups of people. While in a bookstore, one can see that there are magazines for all different types of interests. I looked through a magazine called Nylon, that, until recently, I did not know existed. This magazine’s target group is young adults and focuses on pop culture and fashion. The majority of the advertisements placed in the magazine are for clothes and other accessories like shoes, handbags, and make-up. An advertisement that I found particularly interesting was one that showed a young woman in a half-kneeling position with only one side of her face visible. The print advertisement was for a brand name called Alternative which at simple glance, one cannot tell what product it is selling. Doing research I found out that the advertisement was for a t-shirt company. The advertisement has a tagline that goes “Reduce, Reuse, Rebel” which encourages its consumers to dissent against the “normal” or “average” fashion. I find this choice of words very interesting because it is very similar to what Goodwill Industries employee t-shirts say (which is “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle”). Here, again, the borrowing from thrift stores is apparent in these higher-end clothing lines. It also has a tagline that says “ For Free Thinking People” which makes it clear that the company is aiming for its consumers to want a sense of individuality while wearing their clothing. The name of the company, Alternative, is problematic because if everyone chooses to be “alternative”, doesn’t it just become the new norm?

Photobucket

The primary advertisement, like the secondary advertisement, both appeal to young adults that want to expand their fashion sense into a personal style that matches their individuality. This in a larger sense means that everyone wants to be more of an individual but with the same material things available. Both of these ads give a sense of freedom of choice to consumers to pick whatever they choose to express their so-called individuality.

A Unique Idea

When deciding what to name our blog, we came across “Unique, Just Like Us.” I feel that this strongly states the attitude we face today as a society when we look at ads. We are surrounded by ads that display perfection, which is a common tool in selling products in recent years. In the ad that I have chosen, we see an image of a woman who may, to some, look unique. That is because she underwent plastic surgery to look “unique.” However, the surgery did not turn out right because she did not go to the doctor who helped her originally. This is not the main focus, though. After looking closely, I realized that this is an ad for Cheverolet. The ad is stating that if you do not take your vehicle to the place where it was made, your vehicle will not work properly. Everyone in society wants to be unique but do not consider the consequences before they go through an operation or a quick fix. The consequences are not talked about in the ads, as long as you are perfect and the product sells. This will be the basis of my argument.
We all want to look different, yet be treated the same. We want to be unique. People will spend thousands of dollars to create their idea of a unique look. However, it does not turn out all the time, the way you wanted. Take this recent add by Chevrolet as an example. The woman in the ad may have wanted a unique look. The ad states, “If it’s not fixed by the one who made it, it probably won’t work.” This refers to the fact that the woman had a previous procedure and went to a different doctor. Since she did not use the same doctor, as before, there was a consequence that came with her actions, as this ad represents.

It is obvious that the woman did not like the way her eyebrows, nose, and lips looked. She thought that she looked plain and wanted a unique look to make her appearance stand out. What she got in return was a unique look in general but unfortunately, people who become obsessive with plastic surgery tend to go too far. They end up looking the same as others because doctors are limited in what they can do. Since Chevrolet came up with this idea as a basis for showing what it would be like to use a different choice, even though it makes automobiles, it shows the impact plastic surgery is having on today’s society. Even an unrelated topic is using this as an example of what not do! The company was creative in coming up with this concept. It draws in the attention of the spectator through its imagery of the woman whose plastic surgery did not work out. We strive to be perfect but there are times we need to stick to the “owner’s manual” of life. In addition, they use some scare tactics to sell their products. They tell people to not do something or they will face problems.
The phenomenon of having plastic surgery and the use of unique imagery in ads is further exemplified in this ad from 2006.
toronto plastic surgery

This ad was produced by an ad agency in Canada named DDB Canada. They wanted to take part in the growing phenomenon of plastic surgery, while incorporating unique imagery. They thought of the unique idea of putting different facial features, such as teeth and a nose, in corresponding locations on the cup. For example, they would put the teeth on the bottom of the cup and the nose on the side of the cup. This is to give an idea what that particular person would look like with a new facial feature. However, as one might point out, this concept only works if the person is holding the cup the right way.
The same holds true with plastic surgery. If you do not take the proper steps, you will have a flaw in the end. By having the cup in your hand, you are admitting that either you have thought about surgery or you had surgery done. The cup makes that perfectly visible to the public, just like the previous ad. You may want to hide that “secret” but people will eventually figure it out.
I think this ad has a deeper meaning. Yes, the person wants to have plastic surgery but the question remains as to why. The viewers of the ad might ask themselves why the person wants to have surgery. The person in the ad might think that they are perfect, while others think differently. One would even question the mental health of the person who is holding the cup. Since they are already beautiful, why would they want plastic surgery? The answer is quite simple. We live in a society that thrives on perfection. Some people may not be able to afford the surgery, so they want to mimic the concept in any way they can, even if it means holding a cup that resembles facial features. It all has to do with how we perceive ourselves.
We tend to try to look a certain way, with the idea of perfect beauty, that we end up looking the same and not unique. Yet, there are outcomes that make a person look different but the fact that they went through with the surgery, make them the same as everyone else. People will go to great lengths to achieve perfection and others will simply buy a cup to mimic surgery. That is the way our society thinks today and the images of “perfection” will not go away and will be here for decades to come. It is how we look at these ads and respond to them that are important. Will we actually be “unique” individually or will we be “unique, just like everyone else?”


Erik Wagner
T.A. Steve Wetzel

Everything's okay! (In Moderation)




The commercial you have just seen, paid for be the Corn Refiners Association aims to laud high fructose corn syrup and it’s inclusion (in moderation) in a healthy American lifestyle. The ad aims to paint the white woman as an up-tight, bourgeois, uninformed follower of a false idea and the African American Woman as a streetwise sage.

The first line of spoken dialogue is delivered by the uninformed woman, and is rightly a mean thing to say, “Wow. You don’t care what the kids eat, huh?” punctuated by a disapproving grimace. The streetwise woman replies with a very easy and confident, “excuse me?” to which the uniformed woman replies, “…you know what they say about it (high fructose corn syrup)? Followed by a series of generalizations, awkward musings and a look of utter perplexion. The woman’s eyes look completely blank – she’s at a complete loss for words. As viewers I believe we are meant to identify with her confusion, as though we should think, “Well, I have heard that High Fructose Corn Syrup is bad…but why? Why do I really feel that way?”

During her momentary melt-down, the train wreck of the known colliding with the unknown, while she is put-on-the-spot, the jolly rhythmic music we’ve been enjoying since the commercial began stops, leaving the woman in a chilly silence accompanied very subtly by the sound of children playing in the background.

Before the awkwardness of the moment overcomes the women, the streetwise high-fructose-corn-syrup-serving-mother lays down the facts, “…It’s made from corn, doesn’t have artificial ingredients and like sugar it’s fine in moderation.” During the speech, the music returns, jolly and lighthearted. The tune reestablishes a comfort with a house-hold product, absolving it of its evil reputation and casting it out of the shadows and into legitimacy.

Now, having the facts straight the woman formally resistant to high-fructose-corn-syrup complements the other woman on her blouse and takes a heady sip of the corn-syrup sweetened beverage. The problem is solved and all can return to the birthday party without fear of sweeteners or obesity.

These types of advertisements promote a “feel-good” notion. Optimally, viewers feel at ease in learning something for the first time. And why shouldn’t they? They’ve just learned the facts!

In the final moments of the ad, a banner appears in the lower portion of the screen accompanied by a woman’s voice narration, “Get the facts, you’re in for a sweet surprise.” And offers a website for viewers to learn more.

It’s no mistake that women are cast into these rolls. Traditionally, women have fulfilled the roll of taking care of the family, including decisions about what foods her children eat. Women, specifically mothers, are perceived as being more knowledgeable and conscious about nutrition, and what mother doesn’t want the best for her children? Especially these women with there upper-middle class birthday party unfolding in the background.

Consider this ad for Spud Cigarettes produced in 1968:







The ad proclaims, “Don’t stop smoking, switch to spud, and be mouth happy!” This ad employs the same sort of do not change your habits, your habits are fine. Besides, if you are worried our cigarettes have filters too! So not to worry! Cigarettes are safe- in moderation!

These ads are absolutely unconscionable. It harkens back to the old adage, don’t believe everything you see and hear on TV. These ads work the same way- they create characters- friendly, lovable, characters- characters we are suppose to trust. They become our allies as we navigate a world of uncertainty; they help us to form our opinions.

Why then do such ads omit all the facts? If high fructose corn syrup is really safe in moderation, why isn’t used in moderation? Why is it in so many products from soda to bread? If smoking Spud cigarettes really makes people “mouth-happy” why has smoking been linked to throat and lung cancer? For that matter, if a product is so safe, why do companies bother spending money on a campaign that clears the products name? Perhaps the snappier the jingle the more skeptical we all should be.

Meghan Strobel
TA- Steve Wetzel

This Perfume Will Make You Sexy

Fashion magazines are full of ads doting towards beauty. Clothing ads, jewelry, makeup, skin and hair product ads, and fragrance ads. Almost all are presented in a way that make the model look beautiful, sexy, and healthy. The ads show that if you use the product, you'll look and feel just like the photoshopped model. The ad I chose came from the October 2008's back cover of Vogue magazine. It is a fragrance ad for Calvin Klein's "Secret Obsession" perfume for women. The ad features sexy actress and model Eva Mendes. In the photo, Mendes is giving off a vibe of strong sexual desire, seducing the viewer into buying the perfume. The ad is glamorizing the perfume and selling the idea that if you buy and wear it, it will be your key to desire,and give you the ability to attract men and attain sexual pleasure. 

The ad creates desire for the product and pleasure through the placement of Eva Mendes' body, her facial expression, and her lack of clothing. The shot is from mid-torso up, as if you're on top of her, in what may be a sexual position. Her hands are placed on her neck and chest as if she is in pleasure and is sensually touching herself. Her facial expression is one of lust and seduction.  She's seducing the viewer into buying the product. A big factor into her being able to create desire is by her being nude. Nudity is most often suggestive of sexual activity. Her hair is long and tussled, giving it that "sex hair" look. Despite all of these somewhat scandalous features, the photo still manages to promote a clean and simple sexy, versus a "dirrty" sexy.  All of Eva's physical features and placement of her body gives her a sexual appeal and an aura of desire and pleasure. 
In depicting this sexual appeal and desire, the ad is promoting that by using the "Secret Obsession" perfume, you will look and feel sexy. If you spray on the fragrance, men will be automatically attracted to you and you will be able to achieve sexual pleasure.  Everyone knows that sex sells, and this is a clear depiction of it. With the perfume's title "Secret Obsession, " it promotes the idea that the perfume is a big kept secret for sexual pleasure and attraction, and it's right there for you to find it.   It's Eva's secret, and now it can be yours too. Especially by her eye contact with the viewer, she is seducing you into buying the perfume.
 

Not only can this perfume be the key to attracting men, but it can also be the key to pleasuring yourself.  This idea is better depicted in the commercial, rather than the print ad. Here she is rolling around nude, touching herself, and clearly enjoying it. 
People have always had a strong desire for sex. After-all, we need it to produce, so it's a natural instinct. I think these ads, however, take the desire for sex to a whole new level, giving hints at how our society feels towards sex these days. Now, people are very open about it. Looking and feeling sexy is something you can be open and proud of, unlike in the Colonial and Victorian era, when that was shunned and never seen. Sex, then, was just something you had to do to produce offspring, not something of pleasure, and certainly not for women. These ads make women out to be powerful seductresses. These are women that feel lust and sexual desire, which is now attractive and highly sought after by men. Men would want their woman to have this perfume just as much as women would, so that she is aroused, lustful, and smells sexy.

Dior's perfume, "j'adore" is advertised by Charolize Theron, also a beautiful, sexy actress and model. The picture shows her tugging at her clothes, revealing her chest. She has a clean and fancy sexy about her. She's staring directly into the camera, as if seducing you directly. Her eyes and lips express lust and arousal. Like the "Secret Obsession" ad, "j'adore" is suggesting that if you wear this Dior perfume, you will look and feel sexy, and want to pull your clothes off.
These two ads both carry the same theme of sexual pleasure, desire, and attraction. They use women, staring into the camera to seduce the viewer into buying the product.  What I find most ironic, is that the ads are selling a scent, which we can't even smell when looking at the ad. These types of ads are in great abundance, so this sexual appeal apparently works to attract buyers. Sex sells. 

Dove, Not Scum.

For my project I have chosen to do a close analysis of a commercial which very recently began airing from the Dove Corporation. In recent years the Dove corporation has been airing commercials that feature “everyday woman”, not fashion models, in an attempt to appeal to the average female consumer. They have titled this grouping of ads as a “campaign for real beauty”. The ad that I’ve chosen to analyze is promoting Dove bar soap but doesn’t specify any particular fragrance or other features. Rather than being an ad for a particular product, the advertisement seeks to promote Dove soap in general as superior to all other types of soap. In this ad “two” woman are asked to shower, one with “soap” and one with “Dove”. The ad then shows the different amounts of soap scum left on the woman’s bodies after they have dried off from their showers. Through several techniques, including the use of attractive but average looking models, “clean looking backgrounds and texts in conjunction with their product and most notably product comparisons, the ad successfully taps into it’s target audience, the everyday woman and creates the very feminine desire to be clean.
The ad that I’ve chosen, which can be found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfojlBdOaH8&NR=1 , is an ad for the Dove corporation. This ad seeks to appeal to average woman and plays upon the average female’s desire and need to be clean. The commercial opens by placing light blue text on a clean white background that states “is your soap leaving scum on your skin?”. Immediately the ad has grabbed the attention of it’s female viewer through language like “your skin” and adverse words like “scum”. Also, this opening text features the Dove logo, a small white dove, an easily recognizable trademark that most females would recognize and therefore pay attention to. Next, the viewer is shown two woman showering, one with a Dove bar of soap and the other with an unnamed bar of soap. Notably, the Dove bar is always referred to as “Dove” and the second bar is always referred to as “soap”, insinuating that Dove isn’t soap at all, but something much better. After the woman finish with their showers, we are shown the two females standing next to each other and the female voiceover tells us that “if you could see the difference, you’d see that soap actually leaves an invisible layer of scum on your skin”. While the voiceover speaks, the woman look as if someone has turned a black light on them and we are shown the woman who washed with soap with white spots all over her skin. These spots, are meant to represent soap scum, but it is clearly stated at the bottom of the screen that this is an “artist’s dramatization” of the scum. The woman who washed with Dove doesn’t have any spots on her skin, obviously the desirable outcome. Throughout the entire ad, the woman who uses Dove, even before the shower is shown to be smiling and happy while the woman that uses soap appears rather somber, insinuating that the Dove brand will make it’s users happy because they are cleaner. Cleanliness is the main theme of the ad, and the Dove corporation achieves this in several ways, such as their use of clean white background shown behind the Dove woman and a dull gray background behind the woman using soap. Also, to create the idea that Dove is “cleaner” and perhaps more “pure” that regular soap, we are shown a view of what appears to be cream pouring down the screen into the shape of a Dove bar of soap, appealing to a female’s desire for “natural beauty”, the theme of their corporation’s recent campaign. . One of the more interesting aspects of this commercial for me is the fact that throughout the ad we are told that we are watching two different woman, when in fact these are the same woman. By using one woman to represent two, the company is implying that all woman are the same, and have the same desire to be clean. On a similar note, the ads uses a female that is attractive but not a typical supermodel type. The woman appears to look like an average woman, appealing to the average female the ad targets. The viewers of this ad are able to identify with the “women” and therefore her desire for clean skin lacking “scum” become their own desire. One of the most effective ways this ad creates a desire for the Dove brand of cleanliness is through product comparison. By comparing Dove to “soap”, the ad implies that all other types of soap are inferior to Dove and that unless you use Dove, you will end up with soap scum on your skin, something already established as undesirable. In an ad for Bounty paper towels, a similar tactic is used. While the ads are very different, the Bounty ad uses humor and men to sell their product, both ads rely on product comparison. In this ad http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPSJvkdbUGY , Bounty paper towels are not being compared to a particular type of other paper towel, but other paper towels in general. The bounty towel picks up the mess and continues to work while the “other” towel simply falls apart.
The word “scum” is undesirable, the word “clean” is desirable for all people, but even more so for the average American female. Through advertisements and other form of media, as women we are told that we are to be kept clean and smell nice, this ad appeals to these ideals. When I first saw this particular Dove ad on TV, immediately after it aired I said to myself “wow, that commercial is going to sell a lot of soap”. Of course the Dove brand would have preferred for me to say “sell a lot of Dove”, but close enough right? The reason I assumed the ad would sell so much of it’s product was because of the many different tactics used. From the choice of model, to the use of “clean” backgrounds, to the product comparison and the artist’s rather imposing dramatization of the soap scum, the ad appeals to woman on a very visual level.

Beauty Products




When designing an advertisement, it is very important to define the purpose of the ad. Often times, an ad can have a visual eye catcher, which invokes an emotional response opposite of the intended purpose. If this happens, then the ad will be ineffective. To develop an effective ad, it is important to make sure the message is conveyed accurately and consistent with the purpose. When producing an ad, it is crucial to have a congruency between the intended message, the visual appearance with emotional appeal. and the actual text statement.

A congruency between all components of an ad is key to its effectiveness. Looking at two ads for beauty products at a glance, they seem to conveying the same message “use this product and beauty will be yours." When in actuality, each ad has a very different purpose. The messages are complete opposites. The first shampoo ad has a very positive and congruent layout. There is a beautiful woman who uses the shampoo and looks great with beautiful hair. The ad looks and feels positive and evokes a positive response. To contrast that ad,there is an animal rights ad which does not have congruency of components and the result is disastrous.

The animal rights organization “Freedom for Animals” has designed an advertisement about beauty products. The objective of the ad is to educate the public about companies who test or use animals in the production of their products. The ad put out by the Freedom for Animals group shows a young, beautiful woman with vibrant blue eyes. Her hair is a stylish curly frizzy. It looks very becoming on her, actually emitting the message of beauty. To view this animal rights ad, it evokes the same emotional result as the Pantene shampoo ad, one of beauty. Taking a second look at the Freedom for Animal ad, you see on the right side of the woman’s face there is a red sore or wound. It looks like a chemical burn or a scrap. From a distant it looks like a paint smear. It actually takes a second glance to even see this blemish on the woman’s perfect skin. The purpose of the ad is to educate about animal cruelty in the beauty industry. The ad does little to educate the public about animal cruelty. When looking at the ad the woman’s eyes are such a vibrant blue that it actually detracts from the raw red wound. The beauty portrayed is parallel to that in the actual shampoo ad. The Freedom for Animals seemed to use the wrong approach for their message. Their message is really about the ugly brutality of killing animals but the ad shows a gorgeous woman with stunning eyes. This is an incongruency of the visual appearance. My question is why does the organization want to use an image of beauty to encourage people to stop buying the products? I don’t feel like I have to stop buying the product because the woman is so beautiful. This ad is so ironic because it seems to be promoting beauty products in spite of the ugly truth behind the manufacturing process. Looking at the ad the woman is so gorgeous that the written text messages are totally missed.

The message of the words does not match the visual message. This is an incongruency between the visual emotional appeal and the actual written message. The ad combines both negatives and positive texts related to what the advertisement is about. In the larger font size, it says “FOR Luxuriant HAIR” while next to that statement in a much smaller font size it says “this is how 300,000 lab animals suffer each year.” Next to the smaller message we see the tube of the beauty product. The negative message of this ad is lost because of the text is not forthright and visually available causing an inconsistent message of the text. The negative message is totaling lost there for changing the message of the ad. The ad itself is a positive ad. This ad is supposed to be negative but the emotional response I feel is positive. This inconsistency in regards to emotional appeal as a result of the positive visual is a detriment to the ads message.

Beauty product advertisements appeal to the emotional vanity of beauty. The ads are about the products you use to make you look beautiful like the women in the ads. Can a beauty product ad be negative or positive? There are two different advertisements about beauty products but each ad has a message totally opposite of the other. The objective of each ad is totally different but they employee similar techniques, the positive picture of a beautiful woman. One ad is about products that are being tested on animals, and the other one is suggesting that if you use the product you will be as beautiful as the woman in the ad.

It is very important to match the message to the visual. When producing an ad, it is crucial to have a congruency between the intended message, the visual appearance with emotional appeal, and the actual text statement. The advertisement from Freedom for Animals organization is weak in many ways. The visual is a young beautiful woman with perfect skin and bright blue eyes. The models beauty elicits a positive emotional response which is inconsistent with the ads intended purpose, the message of animal cruelty. The larger font text message contains positives words while the insignificant smaller text is missed, even though it is the intended negative purpose of the ad. Defining the purpose and staying consistent to it is key to an effective advertisement.

Real Beauty




The ad which I chose is the Dove Evolution commercial. This ad promotes the Dove Real Beauty Workshops for Girls which is a campaign to improve self-esteem among young women. The commercial begins with a young woman being seated to have a make-over. The commercial then speeds up as makeup is applied to her face and her hair is being styled with a piano being played at a fast pace in the background. As the lights are flashing in her face, one can tell that snapshots are being taken of her. After this, she is shown as a computer image and most of her features are altered in editing. The camera zooms out to show her face is on a billboard and the music slowly fades out. The commercial fades to black and the statement “No wonder our perception of beauty is distorted.” appears. This fades out and the words “Take part in the Dove Real Beauty Workshops for Girls”. The ad creates desire through visual and aural means. How this ad creates desire through visual means is the situation is taking place in a modern, stylish setting. The music, the way it is edited and shot, and the modernity used in the ad is appealing to the viewer. At first the commercial is really interesting and makes the viewer want to become a part of this world yet toward the end of the ad, the viewer’s mind is blown as it ends nothing like the way they would expect it to. It is an eye opener. This commercial makes one want to accept themselves for who they are. The Dove Evolution commercial portrays modernity and convinces the viewer to accept them self the way they are and not lower them self to the standards of society.



The viewer is drawn into this world as the ad takes place in a photo shoot. The setting is stylish and fashionable. The movements of the makeup artists speed up and fast piano music plays. This evokes a trendy, cutting edge feeling to the ad. It is fast paced. Lights are flashing as snapshots are taken of the woman. It is a world of edge and high fashion. The ad is advanced as technology is used to alter her appearance. The Dove Evolution commercial evokes modernity. The commercial is up and coming. It is fresh and up to date. This commercial also opens the viewer’s eyes. It begins as a trendy, fashionable idea and ends with a profound statement which makes the audience think. The woman’s features are changed through editing and after this, her face is put on a billboard. The viewer can see that her face is fake. Her picture on the billboard is not who she really is. This might make a viewer believe that society has the wrong conception of beauty. The commercial wants to paint an image of what real beauty is. Real beauty is not superficial and edited to change someone’s features. It is accepting one for who they are.







The Dove Commercial: Onslaught follows this same phenomenon. The commercial shows an innocent, little girl in the first scene with the song “La Breeze” by Simian playing in the background. The lyrics “Here it comes, here it comes, here it comes” gradually get louder and the scene switches to pictures of models in lingerie. The commercial then shows ads on television with beauty products to make one look younger, smaller, lighter, fuller, tighter, thinner, or softer. The Dove Commercial: Onslaught also shows women going through the procedures of plastic surgery. By the end of the commercial, the words “talk to your daughter before the beauty industry does” appear. This commercial also promotes real beauty and shows how today’s culture has a warped perception of beauty. It is important to educate young minds and tell them the truth about beauty before society infiltrates their minds.



This ad addresses the standards of the world and how women should not have to lower themselves to fit in. It shows how essential it is that women accept themselves for who they are and not try to be something that they are not. Today’s culture puts pressure on women to look a certain way. This commercial shows that it is significant to teach young minds that they do not have to fit into the mold of the world to be beautiful, but that they are beautiful if they accept them self for who they are.




The state of these two ads show how distorted society’s conception of beauty is. The culture of today teaches people lies and transforms them into something they are not. These ads show the desperation for people to be loved and accepted. They show the heights that people will go to to feeling secure. Society embraces beauty as something that is superficial. The kind of beauty it encompasses is fake. One must look a certain way to be accepted. What these commercials are at large trying to tell people is to not follow the norms of society but understand that one is truly beautiful if they accept them self for who they are.

Rachel Marten
TA: Steve Wetzel