Thursday, October 23, 2008

Recycled Style

When one thinks about originality, many times clothing and a sense of personal style may come to mind. Clothes are, for many people, the way in which they express their personal likes and dislikes. Many times, people use clothing to express their individuality. The advertisement that I chose is called “By the Seashore”. This advertisement showcases the May 2008 clothing line for a company called Free People. The advertisement, which is in the form of a commercial, is made available through YouTube.com, which, in turn makes it accessible and available to be embedded in many popular online outlets such as MySpace or Facebook. This advertisement shows several models by the seashore wearing the clothes made by Free People. The commercial creates the desire to be carefree and also the desire of having liberation in general with the use of visual and aural cues.



The commercial makes this feeling of freedom come across aurally with the use of relaxing background keyboard music. The music gives off a relaxing atmosphere while watching the images on the screen. It is important to note that all of the sound in the commercial is non-diegetic; that is, we do not hear the ocean waves crashing or the sound of wind blowing against the models.

Visually, the commercial shows the models wearing the company’s clothes in relaxed poses along the shoreline. By doing this, it aims to create the desire in consumers of wanting to be just like these models and suggesting that if one wears these clothes, one can also became liberated. It aims to create the feeling that these clothes might be able to make our style even more personal while at the same time, making us more “stylish”.

The clothes that are being sold in this advertisement are created by the Free People company, the same company that also started the Urban Outfitters clothing stores. These stores appeal to young adults wanting to create a fresh, new, unique sense of style. These stores derive their styles from clothing that are typically found in thrift stores and adapt them to be mass-produced and sold at expensive prices. In general, can it be called personal, fresh, fashion sense when it is being fabricated to be mass-produced? Is it new style when it is simply a copy of the past? This particular ad aims to create the desire for the “new”, the undiscovered, the rare. Even the name of the company, Free People, gives the sense that their consumers have the freedom to choose what they want to wear, or that they are free to pick a wardrobe that matches well their own, personal lifestyle. It is also important to note that this clothing company, and thus, this commercial is only aimed at women. The image of woman that is being created in the ad is one that is carefree yet careful in her looks and her fashion sense.

The secondary advertisement, which I found equally as intriguing as the first, I found in a magazine. The magazine industry is aimed at people of all ages with specific magazines aimed for totally different groups of people. While in a bookstore, one can see that there are magazines for all different types of interests. I looked through a magazine called Nylon, that, until recently, I did not know existed. This magazine’s target group is young adults and focuses on pop culture and fashion. The majority of the advertisements placed in the magazine are for clothes and other accessories like shoes, handbags, and make-up. An advertisement that I found particularly interesting was one that showed a young woman in a half-kneeling position with only one side of her face visible. The print advertisement was for a brand name called Alternative which at simple glance, one cannot tell what product it is selling. Doing research I found out that the advertisement was for a t-shirt company. The advertisement has a tagline that goes “Reduce, Reuse, Rebel” which encourages its consumers to dissent against the “normal” or “average” fashion. I find this choice of words very interesting because it is very similar to what Goodwill Industries employee t-shirts say (which is “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle”). Here, again, the borrowing from thrift stores is apparent in these higher-end clothing lines. It also has a tagline that says “ For Free Thinking People” which makes it clear that the company is aiming for its consumers to want a sense of individuality while wearing their clothing. The name of the company, Alternative, is problematic because if everyone chooses to be “alternative”, doesn’t it just become the new norm?

Photobucket

The primary advertisement, like the secondary advertisement, both appeal to young adults that want to expand their fashion sense into a personal style that matches their individuality. This in a larger sense means that everyone wants to be more of an individual but with the same material things available. Both of these ads give a sense of freedom of choice to consumers to pick whatever they choose to express their so-called individuality.

A Unique Idea

When deciding what to name our blog, we came across “Unique, Just Like Us.” I feel that this strongly states the attitude we face today as a society when we look at ads. We are surrounded by ads that display perfection, which is a common tool in selling products in recent years. In the ad that I have chosen, we see an image of a woman who may, to some, look unique. That is because she underwent plastic surgery to look “unique.” However, the surgery did not turn out right because she did not go to the doctor who helped her originally. This is not the main focus, though. After looking closely, I realized that this is an ad for Cheverolet. The ad is stating that if you do not take your vehicle to the place where it was made, your vehicle will not work properly. Everyone in society wants to be unique but do not consider the consequences before they go through an operation or a quick fix. The consequences are not talked about in the ads, as long as you are perfect and the product sells. This will be the basis of my argument.
We all want to look different, yet be treated the same. We want to be unique. People will spend thousands of dollars to create their idea of a unique look. However, it does not turn out all the time, the way you wanted. Take this recent add by Chevrolet as an example. The woman in the ad may have wanted a unique look. The ad states, “If it’s not fixed by the one who made it, it probably won’t work.” This refers to the fact that the woman had a previous procedure and went to a different doctor. Since she did not use the same doctor, as before, there was a consequence that came with her actions, as this ad represents.

It is obvious that the woman did not like the way her eyebrows, nose, and lips looked. She thought that she looked plain and wanted a unique look to make her appearance stand out. What she got in return was a unique look in general but unfortunately, people who become obsessive with plastic surgery tend to go too far. They end up looking the same as others because doctors are limited in what they can do. Since Chevrolet came up with this idea as a basis for showing what it would be like to use a different choice, even though it makes automobiles, it shows the impact plastic surgery is having on today’s society. Even an unrelated topic is using this as an example of what not do! The company was creative in coming up with this concept. It draws in the attention of the spectator through its imagery of the woman whose plastic surgery did not work out. We strive to be perfect but there are times we need to stick to the “owner’s manual” of life. In addition, they use some scare tactics to sell their products. They tell people to not do something or they will face problems.
The phenomenon of having plastic surgery and the use of unique imagery in ads is further exemplified in this ad from 2006.
toronto plastic surgery

This ad was produced by an ad agency in Canada named DDB Canada. They wanted to take part in the growing phenomenon of plastic surgery, while incorporating unique imagery. They thought of the unique idea of putting different facial features, such as teeth and a nose, in corresponding locations on the cup. For example, they would put the teeth on the bottom of the cup and the nose on the side of the cup. This is to give an idea what that particular person would look like with a new facial feature. However, as one might point out, this concept only works if the person is holding the cup the right way.
The same holds true with plastic surgery. If you do not take the proper steps, you will have a flaw in the end. By having the cup in your hand, you are admitting that either you have thought about surgery or you had surgery done. The cup makes that perfectly visible to the public, just like the previous ad. You may want to hide that “secret” but people will eventually figure it out.
I think this ad has a deeper meaning. Yes, the person wants to have plastic surgery but the question remains as to why. The viewers of the ad might ask themselves why the person wants to have surgery. The person in the ad might think that they are perfect, while others think differently. One would even question the mental health of the person who is holding the cup. Since they are already beautiful, why would they want plastic surgery? The answer is quite simple. We live in a society that thrives on perfection. Some people may not be able to afford the surgery, so they want to mimic the concept in any way they can, even if it means holding a cup that resembles facial features. It all has to do with how we perceive ourselves.
We tend to try to look a certain way, with the idea of perfect beauty, that we end up looking the same and not unique. Yet, there are outcomes that make a person look different but the fact that they went through with the surgery, make them the same as everyone else. People will go to great lengths to achieve perfection and others will simply buy a cup to mimic surgery. That is the way our society thinks today and the images of “perfection” will not go away and will be here for decades to come. It is how we look at these ads and respond to them that are important. Will we actually be “unique” individually or will we be “unique, just like everyone else?”


Erik Wagner
T.A. Steve Wetzel

Everything's okay! (In Moderation)




The commercial you have just seen, paid for be the Corn Refiners Association aims to laud high fructose corn syrup and it’s inclusion (in moderation) in a healthy American lifestyle. The ad aims to paint the white woman as an up-tight, bourgeois, uninformed follower of a false idea and the African American Woman as a streetwise sage.

The first line of spoken dialogue is delivered by the uninformed woman, and is rightly a mean thing to say, “Wow. You don’t care what the kids eat, huh?” punctuated by a disapproving grimace. The streetwise woman replies with a very easy and confident, “excuse me?” to which the uniformed woman replies, “…you know what they say about it (high fructose corn syrup)? Followed by a series of generalizations, awkward musings and a look of utter perplexion. The woman’s eyes look completely blank – she’s at a complete loss for words. As viewers I believe we are meant to identify with her confusion, as though we should think, “Well, I have heard that High Fructose Corn Syrup is bad…but why? Why do I really feel that way?”

During her momentary melt-down, the train wreck of the known colliding with the unknown, while she is put-on-the-spot, the jolly rhythmic music we’ve been enjoying since the commercial began stops, leaving the woman in a chilly silence accompanied very subtly by the sound of children playing in the background.

Before the awkwardness of the moment overcomes the women, the streetwise high-fructose-corn-syrup-serving-mother lays down the facts, “…It’s made from corn, doesn’t have artificial ingredients and like sugar it’s fine in moderation.” During the speech, the music returns, jolly and lighthearted. The tune reestablishes a comfort with a house-hold product, absolving it of its evil reputation and casting it out of the shadows and into legitimacy.

Now, having the facts straight the woman formally resistant to high-fructose-corn-syrup complements the other woman on her blouse and takes a heady sip of the corn-syrup sweetened beverage. The problem is solved and all can return to the birthday party without fear of sweeteners or obesity.

These types of advertisements promote a “feel-good” notion. Optimally, viewers feel at ease in learning something for the first time. And why shouldn’t they? They’ve just learned the facts!

In the final moments of the ad, a banner appears in the lower portion of the screen accompanied by a woman’s voice narration, “Get the facts, you’re in for a sweet surprise.” And offers a website for viewers to learn more.

It’s no mistake that women are cast into these rolls. Traditionally, women have fulfilled the roll of taking care of the family, including decisions about what foods her children eat. Women, specifically mothers, are perceived as being more knowledgeable and conscious about nutrition, and what mother doesn’t want the best for her children? Especially these women with there upper-middle class birthday party unfolding in the background.

Consider this ad for Spud Cigarettes produced in 1968:







The ad proclaims, “Don’t stop smoking, switch to spud, and be mouth happy!” This ad employs the same sort of do not change your habits, your habits are fine. Besides, if you are worried our cigarettes have filters too! So not to worry! Cigarettes are safe- in moderation!

These ads are absolutely unconscionable. It harkens back to the old adage, don’t believe everything you see and hear on TV. These ads work the same way- they create characters- friendly, lovable, characters- characters we are suppose to trust. They become our allies as we navigate a world of uncertainty; they help us to form our opinions.

Why then do such ads omit all the facts? If high fructose corn syrup is really safe in moderation, why isn’t used in moderation? Why is it in so many products from soda to bread? If smoking Spud cigarettes really makes people “mouth-happy” why has smoking been linked to throat and lung cancer? For that matter, if a product is so safe, why do companies bother spending money on a campaign that clears the products name? Perhaps the snappier the jingle the more skeptical we all should be.

Meghan Strobel
TA- Steve Wetzel

This Perfume Will Make You Sexy

Fashion magazines are full of ads doting towards beauty. Clothing ads, jewelry, makeup, skin and hair product ads, and fragrance ads. Almost all are presented in a way that make the model look beautiful, sexy, and healthy. The ads show that if you use the product, you'll look and feel just like the photoshopped model. The ad I chose came from the October 2008's back cover of Vogue magazine. It is a fragrance ad for Calvin Klein's "Secret Obsession" perfume for women. The ad features sexy actress and model Eva Mendes. In the photo, Mendes is giving off a vibe of strong sexual desire, seducing the viewer into buying the perfume. The ad is glamorizing the perfume and selling the idea that if you buy and wear it, it will be your key to desire,and give you the ability to attract men and attain sexual pleasure. 

The ad creates desire for the product and pleasure through the placement of Eva Mendes' body, her facial expression, and her lack of clothing. The shot is from mid-torso up, as if you're on top of her, in what may be a sexual position. Her hands are placed on her neck and chest as if she is in pleasure and is sensually touching herself. Her facial expression is one of lust and seduction.  She's seducing the viewer into buying the product. A big factor into her being able to create desire is by her being nude. Nudity is most often suggestive of sexual activity. Her hair is long and tussled, giving it that "sex hair" look. Despite all of these somewhat scandalous features, the photo still manages to promote a clean and simple sexy, versus a "dirrty" sexy.  All of Eva's physical features and placement of her body gives her a sexual appeal and an aura of desire and pleasure. 
In depicting this sexual appeal and desire, the ad is promoting that by using the "Secret Obsession" perfume, you will look and feel sexy. If you spray on the fragrance, men will be automatically attracted to you and you will be able to achieve sexual pleasure.  Everyone knows that sex sells, and this is a clear depiction of it. With the perfume's title "Secret Obsession, " it promotes the idea that the perfume is a big kept secret for sexual pleasure and attraction, and it's right there for you to find it.   It's Eva's secret, and now it can be yours too. Especially by her eye contact with the viewer, she is seducing you into buying the perfume.
 

Not only can this perfume be the key to attracting men, but it can also be the key to pleasuring yourself.  This idea is better depicted in the commercial, rather than the print ad. Here she is rolling around nude, touching herself, and clearly enjoying it. 
People have always had a strong desire for sex. After-all, we need it to produce, so it's a natural instinct. I think these ads, however, take the desire for sex to a whole new level, giving hints at how our society feels towards sex these days. Now, people are very open about it. Looking and feeling sexy is something you can be open and proud of, unlike in the Colonial and Victorian era, when that was shunned and never seen. Sex, then, was just something you had to do to produce offspring, not something of pleasure, and certainly not for women. These ads make women out to be powerful seductresses. These are women that feel lust and sexual desire, which is now attractive and highly sought after by men. Men would want their woman to have this perfume just as much as women would, so that she is aroused, lustful, and smells sexy.

Dior's perfume, "j'adore" is advertised by Charolize Theron, also a beautiful, sexy actress and model. The picture shows her tugging at her clothes, revealing her chest. She has a clean and fancy sexy about her. She's staring directly into the camera, as if seducing you directly. Her eyes and lips express lust and arousal. Like the "Secret Obsession" ad, "j'adore" is suggesting that if you wear this Dior perfume, you will look and feel sexy, and want to pull your clothes off.
These two ads both carry the same theme of sexual pleasure, desire, and attraction. They use women, staring into the camera to seduce the viewer into buying the product.  What I find most ironic, is that the ads are selling a scent, which we can't even smell when looking at the ad. These types of ads are in great abundance, so this sexual appeal apparently works to attract buyers. Sex sells. 

Dove, Not Scum.

For my project I have chosen to do a close analysis of a commercial which very recently began airing from the Dove Corporation. In recent years the Dove corporation has been airing commercials that feature “everyday woman”, not fashion models, in an attempt to appeal to the average female consumer. They have titled this grouping of ads as a “campaign for real beauty”. The ad that I’ve chosen to analyze is promoting Dove bar soap but doesn’t specify any particular fragrance or other features. Rather than being an ad for a particular product, the advertisement seeks to promote Dove soap in general as superior to all other types of soap. In this ad “two” woman are asked to shower, one with “soap” and one with “Dove”. The ad then shows the different amounts of soap scum left on the woman’s bodies after they have dried off from their showers. Through several techniques, including the use of attractive but average looking models, “clean looking backgrounds and texts in conjunction with their product and most notably product comparisons, the ad successfully taps into it’s target audience, the everyday woman and creates the very feminine desire to be clean.
The ad that I’ve chosen, which can be found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfojlBdOaH8&NR=1 , is an ad for the Dove corporation. This ad seeks to appeal to average woman and plays upon the average female’s desire and need to be clean. The commercial opens by placing light blue text on a clean white background that states “is your soap leaving scum on your skin?”. Immediately the ad has grabbed the attention of it’s female viewer through language like “your skin” and adverse words like “scum”. Also, this opening text features the Dove logo, a small white dove, an easily recognizable trademark that most females would recognize and therefore pay attention to. Next, the viewer is shown two woman showering, one with a Dove bar of soap and the other with an unnamed bar of soap. Notably, the Dove bar is always referred to as “Dove” and the second bar is always referred to as “soap”, insinuating that Dove isn’t soap at all, but something much better. After the woman finish with their showers, we are shown the two females standing next to each other and the female voiceover tells us that “if you could see the difference, you’d see that soap actually leaves an invisible layer of scum on your skin”. While the voiceover speaks, the woman look as if someone has turned a black light on them and we are shown the woman who washed with soap with white spots all over her skin. These spots, are meant to represent soap scum, but it is clearly stated at the bottom of the screen that this is an “artist’s dramatization” of the scum. The woman who washed with Dove doesn’t have any spots on her skin, obviously the desirable outcome. Throughout the entire ad, the woman who uses Dove, even before the shower is shown to be smiling and happy while the woman that uses soap appears rather somber, insinuating that the Dove brand will make it’s users happy because they are cleaner. Cleanliness is the main theme of the ad, and the Dove corporation achieves this in several ways, such as their use of clean white background shown behind the Dove woman and a dull gray background behind the woman using soap. Also, to create the idea that Dove is “cleaner” and perhaps more “pure” that regular soap, we are shown a view of what appears to be cream pouring down the screen into the shape of a Dove bar of soap, appealing to a female’s desire for “natural beauty”, the theme of their corporation’s recent campaign. . One of the more interesting aspects of this commercial for me is the fact that throughout the ad we are told that we are watching two different woman, when in fact these are the same woman. By using one woman to represent two, the company is implying that all woman are the same, and have the same desire to be clean. On a similar note, the ads uses a female that is attractive but not a typical supermodel type. The woman appears to look like an average woman, appealing to the average female the ad targets. The viewers of this ad are able to identify with the “women” and therefore her desire for clean skin lacking “scum” become their own desire. One of the most effective ways this ad creates a desire for the Dove brand of cleanliness is through product comparison. By comparing Dove to “soap”, the ad implies that all other types of soap are inferior to Dove and that unless you use Dove, you will end up with soap scum on your skin, something already established as undesirable. In an ad for Bounty paper towels, a similar tactic is used. While the ads are very different, the Bounty ad uses humor and men to sell their product, both ads rely on product comparison. In this ad http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPSJvkdbUGY , Bounty paper towels are not being compared to a particular type of other paper towel, but other paper towels in general. The bounty towel picks up the mess and continues to work while the “other” towel simply falls apart.
The word “scum” is undesirable, the word “clean” is desirable for all people, but even more so for the average American female. Through advertisements and other form of media, as women we are told that we are to be kept clean and smell nice, this ad appeals to these ideals. When I first saw this particular Dove ad on TV, immediately after it aired I said to myself “wow, that commercial is going to sell a lot of soap”. Of course the Dove brand would have preferred for me to say “sell a lot of Dove”, but close enough right? The reason I assumed the ad would sell so much of it’s product was because of the many different tactics used. From the choice of model, to the use of “clean” backgrounds, to the product comparison and the artist’s rather imposing dramatization of the soap scum, the ad appeals to woman on a very visual level.

Beauty Products




When designing an advertisement, it is very important to define the purpose of the ad. Often times, an ad can have a visual eye catcher, which invokes an emotional response opposite of the intended purpose. If this happens, then the ad will be ineffective. To develop an effective ad, it is important to make sure the message is conveyed accurately and consistent with the purpose. When producing an ad, it is crucial to have a congruency between the intended message, the visual appearance with emotional appeal. and the actual text statement.

A congruency between all components of an ad is key to its effectiveness. Looking at two ads for beauty products at a glance, they seem to conveying the same message “use this product and beauty will be yours." When in actuality, each ad has a very different purpose. The messages are complete opposites. The first shampoo ad has a very positive and congruent layout. There is a beautiful woman who uses the shampoo and looks great with beautiful hair. The ad looks and feels positive and evokes a positive response. To contrast that ad,there is an animal rights ad which does not have congruency of components and the result is disastrous.

The animal rights organization “Freedom for Animals” has designed an advertisement about beauty products. The objective of the ad is to educate the public about companies who test or use animals in the production of their products. The ad put out by the Freedom for Animals group shows a young, beautiful woman with vibrant blue eyes. Her hair is a stylish curly frizzy. It looks very becoming on her, actually emitting the message of beauty. To view this animal rights ad, it evokes the same emotional result as the Pantene shampoo ad, one of beauty. Taking a second look at the Freedom for Animal ad, you see on the right side of the woman’s face there is a red sore or wound. It looks like a chemical burn or a scrap. From a distant it looks like a paint smear. It actually takes a second glance to even see this blemish on the woman’s perfect skin. The purpose of the ad is to educate about animal cruelty in the beauty industry. The ad does little to educate the public about animal cruelty. When looking at the ad the woman’s eyes are such a vibrant blue that it actually detracts from the raw red wound. The beauty portrayed is parallel to that in the actual shampoo ad. The Freedom for Animals seemed to use the wrong approach for their message. Their message is really about the ugly brutality of killing animals but the ad shows a gorgeous woman with stunning eyes. This is an incongruency of the visual appearance. My question is why does the organization want to use an image of beauty to encourage people to stop buying the products? I don’t feel like I have to stop buying the product because the woman is so beautiful. This ad is so ironic because it seems to be promoting beauty products in spite of the ugly truth behind the manufacturing process. Looking at the ad the woman is so gorgeous that the written text messages are totally missed.

The message of the words does not match the visual message. This is an incongruency between the visual emotional appeal and the actual written message. The ad combines both negatives and positive texts related to what the advertisement is about. In the larger font size, it says “FOR Luxuriant HAIR” while next to that statement in a much smaller font size it says “this is how 300,000 lab animals suffer each year.” Next to the smaller message we see the tube of the beauty product. The negative message of this ad is lost because of the text is not forthright and visually available causing an inconsistent message of the text. The negative message is totaling lost there for changing the message of the ad. The ad itself is a positive ad. This ad is supposed to be negative but the emotional response I feel is positive. This inconsistency in regards to emotional appeal as a result of the positive visual is a detriment to the ads message.

Beauty product advertisements appeal to the emotional vanity of beauty. The ads are about the products you use to make you look beautiful like the women in the ads. Can a beauty product ad be negative or positive? There are two different advertisements about beauty products but each ad has a message totally opposite of the other. The objective of each ad is totally different but they employee similar techniques, the positive picture of a beautiful woman. One ad is about products that are being tested on animals, and the other one is suggesting that if you use the product you will be as beautiful as the woman in the ad.

It is very important to match the message to the visual. When producing an ad, it is crucial to have a congruency between the intended message, the visual appearance with emotional appeal, and the actual text statement. The advertisement from Freedom for Animals organization is weak in many ways. The visual is a young beautiful woman with perfect skin and bright blue eyes. The models beauty elicits a positive emotional response which is inconsistent with the ads intended purpose, the message of animal cruelty. The larger font text message contains positives words while the insignificant smaller text is missed, even though it is the intended negative purpose of the ad. Defining the purpose and staying consistent to it is key to an effective advertisement.

Real Beauty




The ad which I chose is the Dove Evolution commercial. This ad promotes the Dove Real Beauty Workshops for Girls which is a campaign to improve self-esteem among young women. The commercial begins with a young woman being seated to have a make-over. The commercial then speeds up as makeup is applied to her face and her hair is being styled with a piano being played at a fast pace in the background. As the lights are flashing in her face, one can tell that snapshots are being taken of her. After this, she is shown as a computer image and most of her features are altered in editing. The camera zooms out to show her face is on a billboard and the music slowly fades out. The commercial fades to black and the statement “No wonder our perception of beauty is distorted.” appears. This fades out and the words “Take part in the Dove Real Beauty Workshops for Girls”. The ad creates desire through visual and aural means. How this ad creates desire through visual means is the situation is taking place in a modern, stylish setting. The music, the way it is edited and shot, and the modernity used in the ad is appealing to the viewer. At first the commercial is really interesting and makes the viewer want to become a part of this world yet toward the end of the ad, the viewer’s mind is blown as it ends nothing like the way they would expect it to. It is an eye opener. This commercial makes one want to accept themselves for who they are. The Dove Evolution commercial portrays modernity and convinces the viewer to accept them self the way they are and not lower them self to the standards of society.



The viewer is drawn into this world as the ad takes place in a photo shoot. The setting is stylish and fashionable. The movements of the makeup artists speed up and fast piano music plays. This evokes a trendy, cutting edge feeling to the ad. It is fast paced. Lights are flashing as snapshots are taken of the woman. It is a world of edge and high fashion. The ad is advanced as technology is used to alter her appearance. The Dove Evolution commercial evokes modernity. The commercial is up and coming. It is fresh and up to date. This commercial also opens the viewer’s eyes. It begins as a trendy, fashionable idea and ends with a profound statement which makes the audience think. The woman’s features are changed through editing and after this, her face is put on a billboard. The viewer can see that her face is fake. Her picture on the billboard is not who she really is. This might make a viewer believe that society has the wrong conception of beauty. The commercial wants to paint an image of what real beauty is. Real beauty is not superficial and edited to change someone’s features. It is accepting one for who they are.







The Dove Commercial: Onslaught follows this same phenomenon. The commercial shows an innocent, little girl in the first scene with the song “La Breeze” by Simian playing in the background. The lyrics “Here it comes, here it comes, here it comes” gradually get louder and the scene switches to pictures of models in lingerie. The commercial then shows ads on television with beauty products to make one look younger, smaller, lighter, fuller, tighter, thinner, or softer. The Dove Commercial: Onslaught also shows women going through the procedures of plastic surgery. By the end of the commercial, the words “talk to your daughter before the beauty industry does” appear. This commercial also promotes real beauty and shows how today’s culture has a warped perception of beauty. It is important to educate young minds and tell them the truth about beauty before society infiltrates their minds.



This ad addresses the standards of the world and how women should not have to lower themselves to fit in. It shows how essential it is that women accept themselves for who they are and not try to be something that they are not. Today’s culture puts pressure on women to look a certain way. This commercial shows that it is significant to teach young minds that they do not have to fit into the mold of the world to be beautiful, but that they are beautiful if they accept them self for who they are.




The state of these two ads show how distorted society’s conception of beauty is. The culture of today teaches people lies and transforms them into something they are not. These ads show the desperation for people to be loved and accepted. They show the heights that people will go to to feeling secure. Society embraces beauty as something that is superficial. The kind of beauty it encompasses is fake. One must look a certain way to be accepted. What these commercials are at large trying to tell people is to not follow the norms of society but understand that one is truly beautiful if they accept them self for who they are.

Rachel Marten
TA: Steve Wetzel

Wii Would Like to Play

This commercial for the Nintendo Wii from last year, as well as all of their ads, focuses on togetherness, simplicity of game play (not so much the main focus of this one but still there) and how you can make your very own unique representation of yourself which they call a “Mii”. They want to show the viewer that anybody can play this product, make personal representations of them for the game easily and have fun in a group while doing so.

The ad starts off with two suited Asian men driving to a business building and entering a board meeting with the Nintendo Wii saying: “We would like to play.” It then shows members of the board meeting going through the Mii making process, creating a Mii that looks like the head of the board or boss then giving him funny, false attributes like old lady hair. Everyone starts laughing and having a good time. This is one of the desires they present to us: buy our product and you‘ll have a good time, no matter who you are. It is the desire to have a good time, very relatable.
Having the commercial take place in a work enviroment also gives the idea that the Wii is a stress reliever, which is a great desire for almost anybody who goes through work pains. Everybody in the boardroom is of, relatively, the same age aside from the boss who is a balding older man. It shows the boss not amused at the Mii representing him but finally gives into a smile from how silly it looks. It then shows the boss playing one of the games that comes with the console: Wii Sports. They then show the boss getting a strike in the game [of bowling] and then a voice over that says: “Make your Mii, then play it on Wii”. Having the older boss man get a strike shows the simplicity of the game. It’s saying anybody can play this game, its simple, its fun, it brings people together.
This is also all evident in their first US commercial, for the Wii that came out in ‘06.

In this one the Asian men go to a family’s house and play the Wii with them. Again it shows the simplicity of game play and how everybody in the family can do it, even Mom and Dad! This creates a desire for the parents. When they see that the parents can do it, some Moms and Dads at home watching the ad will see this as a way to spend some time with their kids. Most video games nowadays are usually over the heads of parents and aren’t able to join in. It also shows the people being active during the game play, which also attracts adults to buy the product because it’s not regular couch potato way of playing. All the games for the Wii require the player to be lively when they play. That is the main reason Nintendo made this pioneering game system. Being healthy and active is a big desire for people in our society.
Nintendo aims their ads at everybody but really shoots at the adults, who would be purchasing the product (most likely) for their children. Kids already had the desire for the console before any ads were even released, either because of reading about it online or knowing that Nintendo always puts out fresh, exciting, innovative consoles every time thus the ads are primarily aimed at an older generation. Nintendo is true to their advertisements in that the Wii is a fun, easy, active and social entertainment system not to mention the cheapest one out there but they don’t mention the price in these ads, they believe that the needs they present are enough to draw a consumer in to buy it.

Douglas Mellon
TA: Steve Wetzel

Hi, I'm a Mac.


The vast majority of contemporary advertisements—much like advertisements through out all of history—seek to associate their product with youth. The main difference between old advertising and current advertising is that now youth is associated with nonconformity and free thought. Advertisements all around the country now promote their respective products by giving the impression that those who use them are part of some movement towards an individualistic, nonconformist society. It’s as though big business owners had kids who despised their manipulative marketing tactics and vowed to one day free society from manipulative advertisements that attempt to sway the masses. Instead, they would make advertisements that let people be individuals; ads that valued uniqueness and individual experience. Then, once those optimistic kids grew up, their parents offered them a job, and they were forced to try and appeal to the masses of angry children they used to criticize society with in their youth. This apple commercial is a perfect example of this phenomenon. For starters, it depicts a young man as a Mac, and an old, bland, white-collared man as a PC. This particular Mac commercial accomplishes what the majority of contemporary ads seek to do: portray a product as young, in-style, and superior to its competition in every way—even intellectually.

            Now, in fairness, not all ads try to associate individuality and freedom of thought with their product using the same method as apple. However, even still, the practice is there—just in different form. In this particular ad apple decided to paint their computers as young and superior using both the physical appearance as well as the body language of the “Mac guy.” Notice that the Mac guy is a casually dressed, young adult. He’s wearing very in style clothes: dark, slim fit jeans, a cardigan, and a soft blue button-up. On the contrary, the PC guy is a middle-aged man—nearly old enough to be the Mac guy’s Father. Not to mention, he’s wearing a very dull colored, stiff looking suit.

            Also notice body language. The Mac guy stands comfortably yet confidently with his hands in his pockets. Throughout all of the commotion of the ad he never removes his hands from his pockets except to make one casual hand gesture. The PC guy, however, is extremely stiff. He lacks confidence. His movements are very concise and shifty. His character is clearly portrayed as socially inferior to the Mac guy.

            As for the actual content, this ad is filled to the brim. As a Mac user, I can attest to the thousands of people who claim the only reason they wouldn’t buy a Mac is because they’re afraid to switch from a PC. Apple clearly takes advantage of this well-known fact and introduces a Mac Genius—one of Apple’s product specialists—to inform the viewers that it is now simple and easy to switch to a Mac. The PC guy then goes on to object to such an announcement since “fear of switching [from a PC to a Mac] is the foundation of customer loyalty for PCs.” The viewer is lead to believe that PC users’ only reason for not switching to a Mac is because they’re afraid they would lose their data. But since it’s “now easier than ever to switch to Mac,” they no longer have a legitimate foundation for loyalty, nor do they have a legitimate excuse not to get a Mac. This clearly gives the impression that the world of personal computing has moved on from the old days of PCs. It says that Mac is the new industry standard, and those who don’t use Mac are simply part of the cowardice mob of out of touch 40 year old men and women who fear that losing data would push them over the already looming edge of their mid-life crisis.


            For the sake of comparison, note the attached Audi commercial. This ad attempts to do the exact same thing as the Mac ad; instead of PC, Audi is competing against Mercedes. In this commercial the camera tracks through a living room and the viewer is lead to believe that they are seeing the room’s entire history flash in fast motion before their eyes; starting in what seems like the early-mid 20th century and making it’s way to present day. As this is going on the Mercedes in the driveway flickers, and changes to a brand new Audi A4. The implication is that while Mercedes Benz has historically represented the pinnacle of luxury automobiles, those days are long since gone. Now-a-days, upper class driveways across the country are filled with Audis. Hence the “Progress is Beautiful” caption at the end. This would imply that switching from a Mercedes would be a way of becoming in touch with contemporary culture and moving on from the old way of doing luxury driving.

            The trends of modern advertisement suggest that young adults have a better chance than ever to make an impact in society. Look at our economy. The age-old fortune five hundred companies are failing while investments like facebook are exploding to a net value in the billions within the first 5 years. Our country got fat off of forward thinking and innovation, and now that we’re just fat we need a change. The Chevy Suburban’s that once represented success and flash 5 years ago now represent American greed. Times have changed. So have ads. 


Danny D'Acquisto

TA- Steve Wetzel

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

"That's it, that's All": Snowboarding Culture


There seems to be a trend of same old same old amongst action sports movies in the last few years. A film two years in the making has aspired to break that mold to bring viewers closer to the intensity, and push them to get out themselves. The Quicksilver and Red Bull-sponsored film is titled “That’s It, That’s All” and was released this September by Brain Farm Films. The Hi Definition, 35mm, Super16 footage explains why snowboarders have poured blood, sweat, tears and soul into a simple thing like sliding down a hill on a piece of wood for the past 3 decades. To these snowboarders, the sport gives them something to be passionate about, to explore and travel to new destinations for that next feature. To them it’s a never ending search. But most importantly it’s about just being out there and having fun with friends. The teasers set up a vivid picture of what this film promises to show to its viewer.

Multiple avenues have been taken to promote the film which is touted to be the best snowboard film to date. Magazine ads and youtube video teasers have been posted to promote it.

As far as video ads promoting the movie, the two teasers show portions of film reels turning and HD projectors displaying, editing, and creating a movie. Other clips show slow motion movement of snowboarders down the hill, over jumps and performing spectacular feats of athleticism. Along with these clips are portions spliced in showing what happens when they’re not on the mountain; they’re riding snowmobiles across lakes, flying in helicopters, or witnessing avalanches from the back porch of their cabin at the bottom of the mountain. Extreme angles and clarity give the viewer the feeling of being on the side of the hill watching as these athletes soar 50+ feet over jumps and down half pipes. It’s a definite feeling of freedom and expression of one’s self in a world full of same old same old. Along with the extreme shots of snowboarders are the surroundings of the mountains - the brutality and beauty of nature. There are swooping shots over mountain goats in the hills, avalanches sweeping the sides of cliffs, and soaring over tops of trees and mountainsides in a helicopter. This is the atmosphere for the entire movie.

The third-person objective point of view of the teasers give the viewer the sense of being there experiencing the raw energy and passion that these guys are emanating through their talent. Portions in slow motion draw out the beauty and expression the snowboarders have when performing such feats. Music is very important in grabbing the audience’s attention; it causes the viewer to feel the intensity and pushes them to want to do the same things they’re doing. Softer music in the opposite ad is geared more towards the environment and how peaceful yet hostile and dangerous it can be. Viewers still feel the same emotions of strength yet on a more zealous level. You somehow feel more emotionally attached to the intimacy and power of the character.

Every year millions of dollars are spent on ads to promote new gear, videos, and events for snowboarding, and every year kids pick up a snowboard magazine from the newsstand and see that front cover or ad inside and go “Oh my God, I want to do that!” And if the kid is serious enough, they will beg, borrow, and steal to get money for the equipment. This movie is another channel for ads in that people will watch this movie, see the stuff these guys are doing, the gear they’re doing it with, and want to do the same thing. It is essentially selling a culture to people - a snowboarder’s way of life. This is the way they dress and act, this is the music they listen to, and this is what their lives encompass, now go out and be just as cool as them.

What the ads never do reveal to the viewer is the cost of the culture; how much a complete snowboard and gear actually costs or the risks involved in the sport. Like any sport there are inherent dangers when you’re cruising down a mountain at 50+ MPH or hurl yourself over a 60 foot gap spinning and flipping. Instead the ads invite the viewer to taste the intensity and fun they could be having slaloming down the face of a cliff or bouncing from pillow to pillow of fluffy white snow.

But how could you feel anything but awe when watching such an intense feat?

The Way to a Man's Heart

One of the most intriguing trends in advertising that has not changed much since Marshall McLuhan's book "The Mechanical Bride" was written in 1951 is the portrayal of gender roles and how they are associated with particular products.  What astounds me particularly about this trend is the connection between women and common household appliances.  Women are depicted as being domesticated; stay at home types who take great pleasure in cooking and cleaning for their male counterparts.  They seem to live for these activities, ultimately seeking the approval of their man.  I find it fascinating that even during this modern era where both women and men are equally active in the workforce, the depiction of the ideal woman is one who enjoys cooking and staying in the home.  Although many of these depictions are becoming obsolete, it is obvious that contemporary marketing campaigns are still focused on the notion that women should remain domesticated.

<a href="http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?vid=a199b983-a186-430f-b35e-d288d79aca04" target="_new" title="The Cupcake Queen Commercial&#160;">Video: The Cupcake Queen Commercial&#160;</a>
The Cupcake Queen

One particular ad that struck me was an Electrolux oven commercial called "The Cupcake Queen", featuring morning talk show hostess Kelly Ripa.  Her friend narrates the ad, opening with the assertion that "Just because a woman is single doesn't mean she doesn't understand the right appliances can help you find YOUR McHottie."  In this initial statement we hear the term "McHottie" used so casually that we feel forced to embrace this rather ridiculous new cultural lexicon.  Although we may snicker at the uttering of the word "McHottie", we cannot allow ourselves to ignore the fact that the overall message of this ad is suggesting that women who take their appliances seriously are more likely to land a good man.
She lives in an apartment building "filled with hot guys", guys who come to her door specifically for her cupcakes.  This is a metaphor for the old quip that goes something like 'the way to a man's heart is...' etc.  Apparently its not her intellect, sense of humor, or even good looks that attract the attention of her several gentleman callers.  Its the cupcakes.  And the only way to make the delicious sort of cupcakes that drive the boys crazy is in an Electrolux Double Wall Oven.
I also notice that all of the cupcake guys are quite handsome.  The ad's mission is to get its female viewers 'turned on' by the depictions of these men.  We should therefore associate the attention of an attractive fellow to a woman's acquisition of the right appliances.  The ad is ultimately suggesting that any single woman wouldn't have to be single if she simply knew how to cook.  And this assertion falls slightly short of reality, considering that in this modern era many women and men alike enjoy life being single.  But this commercial is blatantly voicing the ideal status quo of women and men joined together in a 'conventional' union.  We assume that she stays home and cooks while he goes off to work.

A Sanford Home
Another ad I found that depicts this domestication even more so is one for Sanford Home Appliances.  It begins by showing a mother and daughter in their pristine, sterile, and rather hospital room-esque home.  The telephone rings and they gleefully rush to answer.  Daddy is on the other end of the line, in his suit, stepping into his car.  "Is it time for a movie?" he asks.  Mother and daughter are overjoyed, and quickly begin doing random chores.  And each particular chore displays the function and fashion of the various Sanford appliances they own.  A cheesy, cheerful jingle sung by a chorus of women croon about how joyous it is to have a "Sanford Home".
Toward the end of the commercial, daddy comes home and unveils an enormous television that he just bought.  After all, it would seem that he is the bread-winner, and ultimately wields the power to purchase.  In this sequence we can associate products related to home entertainment with the man, and products related to cooking and cleaning with the woman.  And I can't forget to mention that the role of child-rearing is also associated with the woman in this ad.
These two commercials differ in the sense that the Electrolux ad is pushing one particular product, while the Sanford ad suggests that one should fill their entire home exclusively with their appliances and electronics.  But both ads depict a woman who not only has a close relationship with her domestic machines but also enjoys using them, for the benefit of pleasing her man and running a happy home.
Now, I must digress.  Many women are homemakers, and these ads speak more to this particular demographic.  I will admit that not every woman has the opportunity or desire to enter into the professional workforce.  Many opt to stay home and raise a family.  And many are simply denied the chance to succeed in a particular field of work, hence the 'glass ceiling' theory.  But I believe that achieving equality of the sexes becomes undermined by depictions such as these in everyday advertising.  Surely, there is nothing wrong with the role of the domesticated woman.  However this should by no means represent any sort of ideal.  I find it strange and disappointing that even though a lot has changed since the 1950's, advertising still has the power to subtly assert its notions on how gender roles should be properly played.

Every Woman

Estée Lauder’s Sensuous fragrance is advertised in a current magazine campaign. Appearing in fashion magazines such as Vogue, it begins with a large photograph of the fragrance’s bottle. The ad is on glossy black paper, making the brighter images stand out. The main introduction of the product is followed by a photograph of an attractive model dressed only in a white dress shirt. It’s not a glamorous shot; she gazes suggestively, but almost lazily at the camera. Her hair is a bit unkempt, and she sits on top of a bed with ruffled sheets. In a word, she looks relaxed. The next page of the ad is on the same glossy paper, with only the words ‘Every Woman Is Unique’ streamed across. All of the tag lines of this campaign are based on the ‘every woman’ idea that not only are normal women entitled to wear the fragrance, but should. The ad is attempting to make a connection with women through the possibility of enhancing their average qualities. With this certain scent they can keep their casualness while adding a sense of desire about them.



So much of advertising today is translated through images. Words are used less, and when they are, they are structured to serve a quick point. It may be a provoking play on words or engaging combination that’s cause to consider. ‘Every Woman Is Unique’ is certainly to the point, and it comes across as flattery. From the image, women are supposed to be able to connect with the model because she’s not dressed in fancy expensive clothing. In fact, she’s hardly wearing anything. She doesn’t seem to care what she’s wearing, her only concern is comfort. It might be the end of the day and she’s looking to unwind. In a sense, the ad has made that first connection through the simple act of the consumer looking through a magazine. Most women have busy lives, and so the time they take to look through something as trivial as a fashion magazine must mean that they themselves are trying to relax and not worry about important aspects of their lives. These women would appreciate a more casual take on beauty or sensuality. They would probably include themselves in the ‘every woman’ tag then. The ad continues its point with the uniqueness part. It seems to be flattery or encouragement because Estée is accepting those average qualities and suggesting that even though the consumer is an ‘every woman’, she can be sensual and edgy. She can’t be high fashion and couture, so the pitch is that she can obtain a piece of sensuality through the fragrance she wears. It will give her that sense of feeling sexy and extraordinary instead of just tired and worn out, as suggested in the model’s facial expression. The model is portraying that satisfaction of casual style with a hint of intrigue.

If the ad can achieve this, there may still be question as to how they go about expressing their message. Another variation of the campaign features a different model as the ‘every woman’. Her tag line is slightly different though. Instead of unique, she is confident. This is portrayed through the model’s straighter posture and secure smile. She does look confident in herself, and instead of recognizing her as a version of themselves, women viewing it may see what they’d like to be. This is a woman who’s casual, but also happy, which is something to aspire to. The way we perceive confidence though is usually by the way a person carries themselves and through their actions. It's unreasonable to view a fragrance as some sort of magic potion ensuring happiness, but it could act as an illusion that one is more desirable. If it helps a woman to act more confident, then the it could be said that the ad is successful. Someone could be wearing a whole bottle of Sensuous though and still be viewed negatively; it's ultimately up to their decisions and how they behave.

There are numerous substitutes for ‘unique’ and ‘confident’. Other words used in this particular campaign are ‘surprising’, ‘irresistible’, and of course, ‘sensuous’. The interesting thing about the choice of ‘unique’, though is that even though all of the women are in different poses to convey their words, they’re all dressed in the same outfit. Elizabeth Hurley and Gwyneth Paltrow as the models are distinguishable because they’re easily recognized, but they’re made to look the same for the ad. Perhaps this is what was trying to be achieved through the ‘every woman’ emphasis, but it coincides then with the use of uniqueness as a selling point.


The last line of inquiry is the lack of any sample as to what the fragrance may smell like. We are to believe that it’s in fact sensuous, but the consumer won’t know if she likes it until she either buys it or tests it at a store. The ad is claiming its product achieves uniqueness for the buyer, but it appears as any other ad in the magazine without some sort of example of the actual product. The last tag line is that ‘Every Woman Wears It Her Way’. While there are indeed different kinds of women who are probably going to buy the fragrance, it is still the same formula of scents bottled up in the same package. So while the statements made by the advertisement are all true, (yes, every woman is unique) their truths end up having little to do with the product they’ve been matched with. The Sensuous fragrance may make a woman want to carry herself in a casual yet sexual way, but it ultimately won’t make her act or feel that way. If she so chooses to wear it, it will only be carried with her.

Cassie Hutzler


Success

The Nike commercial "Fate" is a recent advertisement that follows the lives of the San Diego Chargers' running back Ladainian Tomlinson and the Pittsburgh Steelers' safety Troy Polamalu, starting in utero and continuing to their meeting playing against each other in a NFL game. The commercial was directed by well known filmmaker David Fincher (Fight Club and Zodiac) with cinematography by Emmanuel Lubezki (Children of Men and Burn After Reading) and music by Ennio Morricone called "The Ecstasy of Gold", taken from the film The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Nike uses all these talents to present a story of success to use as a front for their products. Something to represent what they think their products mean and symbolize. For this ad Nike choose the theme of success and they try to make the viewer desire for that success, like they did in another one of their ads, "Courage", this way making us not look at their products so much, but at their company and what they represent.

The main purpose of the "Fate" ad is (simply and obviously) to make us buy Nike products. This is the elementary purpose of most ads, but how they do this in this particular ad is by presenting a desire for success to the viewer and they present that desire through various means like story, phrases, and music, the main way being the story though. The ad shows clips of Tomlinson and Polamalu growing up and learning the skills that it will take to play in the NFL. For example, it shows them tackling a bean bag, running through a yard, studying in school, and playing amateur football. These early scenes in the ad show that these two people had a desire when they were very young to play football and that it was something they wanted to achieve in life. Then, at the end of the advertisement it shows the two boys, now men, playing pro-football in the NFL and the key moment in that scene is when Polamalu tackles Tomlinson and there is a quick cut of them as kids falling down onto a bed. This cut reminds us of their young aspirations and goals--what they wanted to achieve in life. Then when it cuts back to them as men, it shows that they have indeed accomplished their goals and in fact succeeded in their aspirations. After that tackle, the two men get up and a two words appear on the screen: leave nothing. What Nike means by this is give it your all, fulfill your childhood dreams, create your own success. It summarizes what the ad is about: leave nothing unfinished and fulfill your goals. Through this theme, Nike creates this idea of success that can be affiliated their business and products, even though you don't see any Nike products obviously advertised--there are no Nike T-shirts or shoes that you can easily make out in the ad that are Nike made. That is because they are trying to focus more on a general quality that can be affiliated with their business. Creating an image that can be desired for. The music also contributes to this desire. It is a very ethereal song that evokes a sense of fulfillment and accomplishment. Even in the movie it was originally used in, it's played when a character reaches his goal of finding the treasure he's been looking for the whole film. All these aspects of the ad contribute to the one desire Nike is trying to make: success.

Nike uses this form of immersing the viewer in its theme in a lot of its advertisements, "Courage" being another one of them. In "Courage" there is a series of quick shots, consisting mostly of people accomplishing great athletic feats, accompanied by a song by the Killers, "I've Got Soul, but I'm not a Soldier." It shows athletes sometimes making and sometimes failing in their game. But either way, it shows them trying to accomplish their dreams no matter the odds or obstacles. This ad it makes you see them succeeding no matter if they actually win or not, because as long as they have tried, they are not losers, but winners. It shows that as long as you try, you are a winner--you succeed. The phrase at the end of the ad is "just do it," and that sums up what I just said: as long as you do it, you win.
These ads create a desire for success by showing examples of it. Nike doesn't try to simply advertise their product, but instead tries and show us what they want to represent as a company by invoking those desires within us through their ads. They want the viewer, after watching the ad, to feel that they are also capable of reaching their own goals and succeeding in their own life, like the people in the advertisement. This way, through the desires they have created, people will now want to buy Nike products, because now they represent something more then an inanimate object. They represent something that can link the viewer of the ad to the success that that specific person hasn't yet accomplished. Buying a Nike product has now turned into a Freudian-type of desire to fulfill something from childhood and it tells you more about the person buying the product then the actual product does. For example, it's not the shoes the person has, but what that person wants to do with those shoes that tells us about themselves and what they wants to accomplish. Most people still have something they want to accomplish in their life and these ads show us that we shouldn't let anything hold us back. That we should embrace the things we haven't accomplished and try to fulfill them. And even if we can't actually fulfill them, we can still succeed at it because as long as we know that we've tried, we can consider ourselves not a failure, but a success.
Travis Torok
TA: Steve Wetzel

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Miller Lite and the Man Laws: Barbaric Rituals Live On

Miller Lite and the Man Laws: Barbaric Rituals Live On

By Robert Francis Curtis

“Man Laws” was an advertising campaign put out by Miller Brewing Company in 2006 which ended in 2007. These television commercials were inspired by both the unwritten rules of manhood and the legend of King Arthur. The “men of the square table” would discuss various topics in “man-culture” until they settled on a rule about whatever the discrepancy and called it a man law. The table consisted of many idealistic and iconic figures in the realm of pop culture in regards to men including Burt Reynolds (the leader), professional wrestler Triple H, boxer Oscar de le Hoya, and NFL Pro Bowler Jerome Bettis. These commercials (such as the one viewable below) parody government, spoof super heroes, and in every way attempt to embody the ideal manly-man’s desire of being a tall tale. In many ways, including humor, setting, characters, and the laws themselves these commercials attempt to sell the product (light beer) to men by having them project themselves upon these iconic figures and through a psuedoindividuality create a false connection between the idea of being “the man” and being a man.

In his book The Mechanical Bride, Marshall McLuhan states, “the attitudes of Superman to current social problems likewise reflect the strong-arm totalitarian methods of the immature and barbaric mind.” Similarly, the attitudes of the iconic men who sit at the square table also reflect an impression of immature and barbaric mind sets. In the ad High Five, the council discusses in all seriousness the validity of the high five as a celebration. Clearly meant to be comical, this concept displays men as childish and immature. The idea that this small council of six to eight men can decide laws for all of mankind seems barbaric and ridiculous in and of itself. Why should Burt Reynolds be the end all be all of man culture? Perhaps it is because he has been a man’s man icon since the early 1970’s because of his film career, television work, and his cultural status. He was the number one money making celebrity for five straight years (1978 – 1982) portraying gamblers, outlaws, bandits, womanizers, and all around hard core men brawling and grinning the entire way. Still though, why should such an unsophisticated barbarian like Burt Reynolds be the leader of men everywhere? The majority of men within the demographic the ad has been aimed towards at some point in their lives probably wanted to be him. He dated starlets, drove fast cars, and shots guns with a smile behind a debonair mustache. Men in their early adult years during the seventies can relate to him as an icon and a hero because to them he was for at least five consecutive years.

Though Burt Reynolds is the leader of men according to Miller Brewing Company, many other icons of manliness appear from time to time. For example, Aron Lee Ralston was a member of the council in the commercial titled Fridge Incident. Ralston is mildly famous for having had a boulder fall upon his arm while he was canyoneering and then proceeded to cut it off with a simple dull pocket knife. It also includes Ty Murray, a seven time All-Around World Rodeo champion. Indeed, even the less recognizable faces in the man law meetings are men who have done something above and beyond the normal spectrum of physical strength and mental capacity. They are what men should want to be according to Miller Brewing Company. They are like the Marlboro man or Rocky in that they embody the truest virtues of a stereotypical American, beer drinking man; underdogs that overcame adversity, and real genuine working men




(A) A picture of Marlboro's famous Marlboro Man campaign.

This is not the first time Miller Brewing Company, or any company for that matter, has attempted to pitch a product to men by creating advertisements that projects the image of the everyman, tough and proud. As previously mentioned, Marlboro also attempted to sell cigarettes by having their spokesperson be a ranching cowboy in the Wild West. He was hard working, strong, and weathered by the beauty and danger of the wilderness lands in America. This is a trend in advertising, as well as American pop culture, that seems to be revisited over and over again. McLuhan uses Superman as an example of barbaric mindsets in the average man, but many others exist. These ideal characters are not new to human mythology either. The Greeks created Hercules, and the English created King Arthur just as we create superheroes. These are the ideals of what a man should want to be according to popular thought.




(B) A picture of Disney's Hercules. A character created in Greek mythology that has survived until today.
(C) An advertisement from the most recent Superman film. Superman has been around for nearly one hundred years.

The idea of super heroes and men is what makes the most interesting aspect of this commercial the location of the man law meetings. The take place in a glass room, rose upon a platform identical to those of old war rooms in atomic age cinema, suggesting that men are at war. It is like the secret lair of a secret society, allowing a viewer to picture it deep inside of a mountain and fortified the way only a man’s sanctuary could be. The setting of these meetings implies brass and bravado, intelligence and strategy while all the long poking fun at the idea of the Bat cave or the Fortress of Solitude. There is even an old man writing down the rules in the corner f the room, suggesting weird take on the super hero’s assistant. The iconography of this commercial continues beyond that of old time heroes and their lairs but even in the rules themselves.

This commercial has spawned a pop culture phenomenon known as “It’s a man law.” The phrase has popped up around television and films ever since. It has been referenced in things as diverse as Stephen King’s book Duma Key and Power Rangers: Operation Overdrive (a television series). The topics dealt with in this series of ads ranged from high five resolution to fingers poking in beers to the appropriate etiquette when attempting to woo a best friend’s ex-girlfriend. At times the topics discussed in these man law meetings are not even about beer but rather life and lifestyle; technology has gone mad, or beating traffic shall never interfere with game day. The comical side of these ads can be seen, but a greater issue still remains. Is a man a man, and therefore any man, because he drinks Miller Lite or is a man the man, like the iconic figures pitching the brew, because he drinks Miller Lite?

Through the art of manipulation the viewer believes that they can be just like Burt Reynolds and Triple H, and too can decree the laws of manly men but the wide spread pop-culture of “Man Laws” is evidence enough that men have just joined together in yet another barbaric ritual of clinking there bottle together while they drink their brain cells away. By following not only the man laws but the guidelines of an advertisement men become like sheep not the Bandit. A man is much more than icons and super hero spoofs. Unfortunately, like many advertisements in this world, stereotypes get laughs, and that’s what sells.